There’s a discussion about circumcision going on in a group I’m in, and honestly I have such a hard time with it.
Obviously I’m against circumcision. Most of the women in the group are against it. That’s great! My problem is when people say “Well, you know, I don’t want to do it. I’ve researched it and I think it’s awful, and if it was only up to me, I’d never ever do it. But my marriage is more important than this one issue, so we’re going to do it anyway.”
I have no understanding of this. None.
Let’s imagine a wee scenario. Your beautiful, perfect, brought-home-whole baby boy is whoosh - 32 years old! Wow, the time flies. He’s married and has a few kids of his own. One day, your husband comes home and seems a bit angry. You ask your now-middle-aged spouse what’s wrong. He says
“I want a divorce unless our son is circumcised. It’s the end of our marriage unless he gets cut, right now.”
It seems obviously absurd that a father would demand that an adult child mutilate their genitals to save the parents’ marriage. How is it different when your son is 32 hours old instead of 32 years? Yet women do this to their children. Knowing that it’s not medically beneficial to the child, that it causes more harm than good, that it removes the most sensitive parts of the penis.
Here’s another scenario. Well, more of a question, really. What parts of your daughter’s genitals does your husband get to have cut off? None? ‘You’re crazy’? Indeed. That is crazy. So is male circumcision.
Ladies, please consider the man involved. Not your husband, but the man your son will become. Let him decide if he wants to be circumcised. Having trouble convincing your husband now, even with all the facts at your disposal? Understandable. Say this earnestly, tearfully, cheerfully, whatever you think is best, until you’re blue in the face:
“I’m sorry. I just can’t let you do this to our baby.”
The end.





